Former cricketer-turned-politician Navjot Singh Sidhu made headlines with his surprising claim that he cured his wife Navjot Kaur Sidhu’s stage 4 cancer through lifestyle changes and Ayurvedic remedies. However, this bold assertion has now landed him in legal trouble, as the Chhattisgarh Civil Society has slapped him with a ₹850 crore notice, alleging misinformation and potential harm caused by his statements.
Doctors Call Out Sidhu’s Allegations as Misleading
Dr. Kuldeep Solanki, representing the Civil Society, has categorically dismissed Sidhu’s claims as false. According to Solanki, such statements are creating confusion among the public regarding allopathic treatments, leading to some cancer patients refusing life-saving medications. This misinformation, he asserts, has significantly increased the risk of mortality for those battling the disease.
A Call for Proof or Legal Action
The Civil Society has issued a clear ultimatum to Sidhu. Within a week, he must provide concrete evidence to back his claims. Failure to do so could result in legal action and a demand for ₹850 crore in compensation. Dr. Solanki stressed that Navjot Kaur Sidhu should clarify her husband’s statements and admit the lack of medical records supporting his assertions in a public press conference.
The Alleged “Cancer Cure” Regimen
Navjot Singh Sidhu’s touted cure revolved around natural and Ayurvedic elements such as raw turmeric, basil leaves, lemon water, apple cider vinegar, and neem leaves. He also claimed his wife consumed juices from pumpkin, pomegranate, walnuts, amla, and beetroot, alongside meals prepared with coconut and almond oils. Even tea, he said, was brewed with clove, jaggery, and cinnamon. According to Sidhu, these disciplined lifestyle choices—not medical treatment—cured his wife’s cancer.
Doctors Dispute the Science Behind Sidhu’s Claims
Medical experts have expressed serious concerns over Sidhu’s assertions. They acknowledge that while these dietary elements may contribute to overall health improvement, there is no scientific evidence to support their efficacy in curing cancer. The spread of such unverified claims, they argue, undermines trust in scientifically proven treatments and could put lives at risk.
What Lies Ahead?
With mounting pressure from medical professionals and the legal notice hanging over his head, Sidhu faces a critical week to either substantiate his claims or face significant legal and reputational consequences. Will he provide the evidence, or will this controversy unravel further? The coming days promise to bring clarity—or more chaos—to this unfolding drama.